
The Bombay High Court while rejecting anticipatory bail applications of
five accused in the multi-crore QNet scam, has observed that "the deceit
and fraud is camouflaged under the name of e-marketing and business".
This scheme is undoubtedly a multi-level marketing (MLM) activity and a
pyramid structure of such scheme is prepared so that the members are
promised to get money on purchase and sale of products, the Court said.
In a hard-hitting order on 6 May 2016, Justice Mridula Bhatkar said,
"The motto of the company 'sell more, earn more' appears very attractive
and innocuous. However, this motto is fully camouflaged. The company
stands on a basic statement that people can be fooled. Thus, the true
motto is 'sell more earn more' by fooling people. In fact it is a chain
where a person is fooled and then he is trained to fool others to earn
money. For that purpose, workshops are conducted where study and
business material is provided with a jugglery of words, promises and
dreams. Thus, the deceit and fraud is camouflaged under the name of
e-marketing and business."
"It has very grave and serious impact on the economic status and mental
health of the people on a large scale. On considering parameters of
section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, I am not inclined to
protect the accused. It won't be out of place to mention that such
circulation is required to be stopped. It is necessary for the
prosecution to take injunctive steps against this business activity,
which is prima facie, illegal. Though by stopping this business, a large
group of people may get financially affected, however, it will save
larger groups of people from becoming prey of this activity," the Bombay
HC said.
The HC rejected bail applications of five including, Srinivas Rao Vanka
and Magaral Veervalli Balaji, both directors of Vihaan Direct selling
(India) Pvt Ltd, Suresh Thimiri, director of Transview Enterprises India
Pvt Ltd, Malcolm Nozer Desai, who is a 20% stakeholder in Vihaan and
Michael Joseph Ferreira, former world champion of billiards and an 80%
stakeholder in Vihaan.
"I have gone through the plan which is given by QNet to every individual
representative (IR)," Justice Bhatkar said. "I have gone through the
statements of many witnesses, who claimed that they have been cheated
under the scheme launched by QNet. I have also considered the conclusive
report of Serious Fraud Investigation Agency (SFIO) under the Company
Act) SFIO Prima facie, there is material to hold that the business
conducted by Qnet is covered under PCMC Act and also under Drugs and
Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954."
"However," the Bench added, "the things are not as straight as they are
perceived on the surface. Assuming that the scheme was launched with a
noble object to give benefit to maximum people to make money quickly and
easily by selling products of the company, however, after going through
the material placed before me including the statements of the
witnesses, I am of the view that in the midway, the intention of the
applicants/ accused, who are the directors and shareholders of the
company, became dubious. They had knowledge that more members are
suffering financial losses and they are not satisfied with the products.
The claim that the wellness products i.e., Biodisk and Chi Pendent are
medicinal and spiritual products, are after all, a matter of faith.
However, the applicants/ accused have launched these wellness products
with ulterior motive and with correct judgment of vulnerability of the
people. The holiday packages, which were sold or offered, without any
choice left to the buyers. The entire business was Internet based and,
therefore, the persons who are responsible i.e., the top brass i.e., the
applicants/ accused, were not approachable to the persons who were
aggrieved. The nature of the business was knitted in the interest of the
Directors and shareholders in such a manner that the persons who are at
the lower level of the pyramid cannot get any access to put up their
grievances. The manner in which the persons were contacted, incentives
offered, the workshops were conducted, are best examples of inducement."
Earlier, Pradeep Gharat, special Public Prosecutor submitted before the
Bench that Vanmala Hotels, Travels and Tourism Services Private Ltd and
Pallava Resorts Private Limited have created a Website and travel
packages. "The commission was not paid on the products though the new
members were introduced. The registered office of Vanmala Hotels,
Travels and Tourism Services Pvt Ltd company is a call center," he
said.
He further submitted that in December 2014 the Ministry of Corporate
Affairs sealed their office at Chennai and declared Gold Quest
International Pvt Ltd and QuestNet Enterprise (P) Ltd as the fraud
companies. "Thus, money is collected online and though the Independent
Representative number is given, actual money was not available for
withdrawal. Said money was laundered outside India. The police in the
investigation have come across 73 bank accounts of Q Net Ltd and total
laundering of is around Rs135 crore," Adv Gharat had said.
Below is the order passed by the Bombay HC…
Earlier in February 2016, the special Maharashtra Protection of Interest
of Depositors (MPID) Court had also rejected anticipatory bail
applications of these five. The Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of Mumbai
Police, which is probing the case, had invoked the stringent MPID Act
against controversial multi-level marketing (MLM) company QNet, which
has denied any wrongdoing on its part.
Gurupreet Singh Anand, a computer consultant from Lokhandawala, Andheri
in his first information report (FIR) stated that his wife was duped for
Rs30,000 by some people who had introduced themselves as the
independent representatives (IRs) of QNet.
While arguing before the HC in person, he contended that the illegal
money circulation scheme is being conducted in India by changing names
from GoldQuest to QuestNet to the current QNet.
Earlier, the SFIO in its detailed ‘secret’ report
on GoldQuest International Pvt Ltd and Quest Enterprises India Pvt Ltd
has called multi-level marketing (MLM) schemes run by overseas operators
as “a potential threat to national security”.